Green “Disparate Impact”

Thomas Sowell’s article here.

Skyrocketing housing prices are forcing out families with children, as well as blacks and other people with low or even moderate incomes.

What could be causing this?  Is that just the way it is in California, expensive housing means few lower income families?  Has it always been like this?

Prior to 1970, California housing prices were very similar to housing prices in the rest of the country. In more recent times, it has not been uncommon for California homes to cost three times what homes cost nationwide.

The main cause is open space laws. 

In other words, they can keep out the less affluent people — or, as they put it, “preserve the character of the community” — while benefiting themselves economically in the name of green idealism.

If this was something George Bush did we would call it racism, but because it is done by those on the left they get a pass.

When a business sets standards or policies with adverse effects that fall disproportionately on minorities, courts call that a “disparate impact” and equate it with discrimination.

Published in: on January 29, 2008 at 4:20 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

Ronald Reagan and Ron Paul

Published in: on January 29, 2008 at 3:56 pm  Leave a Comment  

Barack Obama is not good for America

Somebody needs to say it! 

Published in: on January 28, 2008 at 3:52 pm  Leave a Comment  

The Horatio Alger myth or reality?

According to Thomas Sowell the Horatio Alger myth is more reality than myth.

When we talk about “the rich” and “the poor” we mean rich and poor human beings, not rich and poor statistical brackets. Yet politicians and the media treat people and statistical categories as if they were the same thing.

Check out these numbers.

The even bigger joker is that taxpayers whose incomes were in the bottom 20 percent in 1996 had a 91 percent increase in incomes by 2005.

Meanwhile, taxpayers in the top one-hundredth of one percent — “the rich” or “superrich” if you believe politicians and the media — had their incomes drop by 26 percent over those very same years.

 Brackets don’t move the people in the brackets do.

You can check out the numbers for yourself in a November 13, 2007 report from the Treasury Department titled “Income Mobility in the United States from 1996 to 2005.” You can find a summary of the same data in a Wall Street Journal editorial that same day.

These are not the only data that tell a diametrically opposite story from the usual political and media story that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.

A previous Treasury Department study showed similar patterns in individual income changes between 1979 and 1988.

Moreover, a study conducted at the University of Michigan, following the same individuals over an even longer span of time, likewise found most people moving from income bracket to income bracket over time — especially among those who began in the bottom 20 percent.

The University of Michigan Panel Survey on Income Dynamics showed that, among people who were in the bottom 20 percent income bracket in 1975, only 5 percent were still in that category in 1991. Nearly six times as many of them were now in the top 20 percent in 1991. (emphasis mine)

Read the article here.

Published in: on January 23, 2008 at 8:40 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , ,

Carpooling, ain’t it great

today-pic.jpg

 The Today Show carpools to work and helps us all understand a little better how we can help the environment.   But are they really committed?

 “Too many of us in this country commute to work alone,” host Matt Lauer said. “And the planet is paying the price. Since the average car pumps twice its weight in carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, driving alone is a major factor in greenhouse gas buildup. So wait ‘til you hear how much fuel we could save in this country if each car carried just one more person.”[snip]

When Vieira proposed that “we could do this every day, guys,” Lauer sarcastically added, “We could also live in a tree for the rest of our lives.” Roker suggested, “Let’s eat some Grape Nuts.”[snip]

You mean this isn’t a practical answer to solving environmental issues real or imagined?  It doesn’t sound like the folks at the Today Show really take this all to seriously. tsk tsk

Roker later explained that they can’t carpool every day because the hosts live different directions from the studio. But just because (chauffeured) carpooling doesn’t work for television superstars doesn’t mean it’s not good enough for you.

You are right Al, the rest of us live near those we work with.

Read about their trip here at businessandmedia.org

Published in: on January 23, 2008 at 5:17 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

Nap time?

Pastor please don’t stop I need about 15 more minutes.

The head nod that occurs about 45 seconds in is classic.  Is he sleeping?   No, he was just saying amen brother.  Kind of reminescent of this clip from after Ron Brown’s memorial service.

Published in: on January 22, 2008 at 12:48 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

The Day of Reckoning Approaches!

Pat Buchanan today

To stave off recession, the Fed appears anxious to slash interest rates another half-point, if not more. That will further weaken the dollar and raise the costs of the imports to which we have become addicted. While all this is bad news for the Republicans, it is worse news for the republic (emphasis mine). As we save nothing, we must borrow both to pay for the imported oil and foreign manufactures upon which we have become dependent.

We are thus in the position of having to borrow from Europe to defend Europe, of having to borrow from China and Japan to defend Chinese and Japanese access to Gulf oil, and of having to borrow from Arab emirs, sultans and monarchs to make Iraq safe for democracy.

We borrow from the nations we defend so that we may continue to defend them. To question this is an unpardonable heresy called “isolationism.”

And the chickens of globalism are coming home to roost.

I have not been nearly as critical of or even concerned about globalism as many others have but Buchanan makes a good argument for realism.  We simply do not have the resources to continue spending at this clip either domestically or abroad. 

Last week, Moody’s warned that if the United States fails to rein in the soaring cost of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the nation’s credit rating will be down-graded within a decade.

Our political parties seem oblivious. Republicans, save Ron Paul, are all promising to expand the U.S. military and maintain all of our worldwide commitments to defend and subsidize scores of nations.

Democrats, with entitlement costs drowning the federal budget in red ink, are proposing a new entitlement – universal health coverage for the near 50 million who do not have it – another magnet for illegal aliens. Moody’s is telling America it needs a time of austerity, while the U.S. government is behaving like the governments we used to bail out.

Its hard to imagine any candidates actually cutting spending, including Ron Paul.   He votes against all spending but it doesn’t stop him from putting earmarks in the spending bills for his district. 

This self-indulgent generation has borrowed itself into unpayable debt. Now the folks from whom we borrowed to buy all that oil and all those cars, electronics and clothes are coming to buy the country we inherited. We are prodigal sons, and the day of reckoning approaches.

Published in: on January 15, 2008 at 9:48 pm  Comments (23)  

Ron Paul

Ron Paul makes a lot of sense on a lot of issues.   Here he explains why he should be electable in a Republican primary; he is a strict constructionist and a fiscal conservative (who actually votes against spending).   Of course, I bristle at his use of the word empire to describe our foreign policy.  I don’t mind his disagreement with the way we have conducted the war on islamofascism, but empire c’mon. 

Published in: on January 15, 2008 at 12:25 am  Leave a Comment  

Why not John McCain?

 john-mccain.jpg

Two names is all it takes for me to answer that question.

McCain-Feingold

But there are a lot more and fortunately Mark Levin has written a helpful article over at the National Review Online outlining those other reasons.   His domestic record is particularly horrible. 

Published in: on January 14, 2008 at 12:31 am  Leave a Comment  

After Iowa

What not to do after a 3rd place finish in Iowa.

What to do after a 3rd place finish in Iowa.

Is this what turned things around in New Hampshire for Hillary?  Did this change peoples mind about her?  The polls showed Obama surging.  Did her passion sway the people of New Hampshire?  Was this authentic or were these alligator tears?  I don’t know.  Were the polls really that wrong?  They showed Hillary losing by 8 points in New Hampshire. 

Oh and am I supposed to get excited that McCain won for the Republicans?

Published in: on January 9, 2008 at 11:34 am  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.